Pages

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

So Far...

Just want to add this post to explain were I’m at with this project. For now I have come up with a story idea which I hope once I have had my interim crit, I will be able to start properly storyboarding next week. By the end of next week I hope to have finished my final storyboards along with an Anamatic giving me three weeks to test and finish my final animation.

As I have mentioned in the past few weeks of the project, my two concepts for my one minute animation are; a matchbox and a Myopic. With these two concepts I hope to create a subtle comedy based around love.

- Story Idea – The matchbox is lonely, He suffers from Myopia but doesn’t know it. In the first of the three acts I want to introduce the character to show the audience what Myopia is all about giving them a general understanding or emotion to the character. I have been looking at some “Mister Magoo” to help with my research but I don’t want to look at it too much otherwise the final piece could lack originality. After the audience has become aware of the character I want to give him an aim.

At the end of chapter one, I want to show the matchbox aiming in on an interest. In this case, he finds himself becoming excited towards a “Belisha beacon” (Light at a zebra crossing). He finds himself becoming mesmerized by the beacon believing it to resemble a giant match. He wants to fill the emptiness which fills his box.

Now this is where I’m rather stuck, I have never been very good at rounding off a story and this is why it is taking me a while to resolve the final scene. I was originally thinking that I wanted the matchbox to try and woe the beacon but in all of his attempts become aware of it as just a beacon and not a match at all.

- For the essay, I have already tried to get an early start by researching two people who I find of interest. Firstly I have been looking a Winsor Mccay because true fully I find his work really inspirational, especially with this unit and animation in general. What he did for animation in the early 1900’s is truly amazing, something we all have him to thank for. The Second person I have been looking at Is John Lasseter. To me he is another who is amazing with what he has achieved. I really like the two of them as they are at opposite ends of the animation timeline. Hopefully my draft for this essay will be finished at the start of the Easter term freeing up time for me to complete the animation.

- Lastly but also as important as the rest of the posts content, I just want to update on the time line. So far I have research in word document folders which I’m trying to add up in order. I was thinking though if it would be possible to add a post at the end of the project with the links of my posts in order of the Animation timeline. Starting from beginning to end in the correct order. Hopefully this will make it a lot easier for people to access in the near future.

2 comments:

tutorphil said...

Interim Online Review 23/03/10

Hi Adam,

I don't want to dishearten you, but I suggest a rethink of your story idea; I think you've gone a bit large and moved the matchbox out of its environment - in terms of scale. I like the idea of the matchbox yearning after the beacon, but the emotional state of the empty matchbox might be too complex a backstory to convey in an Act 1 set up of 20 seconds...

So, you have a hopelessly short-sighted matchbox - which means that it will be clumsy and unaware of its surroundings; it's one of those scenarios when the audience knows more about matchbox's situation than the matchbox does itself; could you set it up that the matchbox is getting into near-disastrous situations - but doesn't know it? It sort of reminds me of this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecU7k9tyjkY

Or, if you were a short-sighted matchbox, you'd keep lighting the wrong thing; so perhaps the matchbox simply wants to light the wick on the candle, but instead sets fire to lots of other, funny stuff - only the matchbox has no idea - you know, like sticks of dynamite etc. I notice from your drawings that you're not including the matches themselves as part of the matchbox - you should, otherwise how is it going to make fire?

You might consider looking at 'Matchbooks' alongside matchboxes? Either way, I think you'd be missing an opportunity if you don't include the matches as part of your object...

In terms of your essay, you need to identify a point of view that you want to bring across to your reader - which means Adam, that you have to think more seriously about the way your chosen animator fits into the bigger picture - what do you want to prove or say? What is your argument/point? See following post for advice re. the proper relationship between the introduction and the main body of your assignment...

tutorphil said...

Use your introduction* to state clearly the investigative intention of your written assignment and the means by which you are going to support your discussion; for instance:

‘This essay will investigate the animated films of The Brothers Quay in relation to Freud’s theory of the Uncanny - with particular focus on Street of Crocodiles (1986) and The Comb (1990)…

Or

‘The stop-motion animator, Ray Harryhausen is arguably the father of modern day cinematic fantasy. What follows is an investigation of his life and work in relation to the development of special effects…’

Stylistically, it is often clarifying to begin with a key-note quote or bench mark statement that sets the scene for the discussion… for instance:

‘… the Brothers Quay's works are independent of any definable genre; indeed, the imitation of their unique style which can be observed in films of other animators are a complimentary gesture to the auteur style they have developed. Throughout their opus, a continuity can be observed - Quays' devotion to the marginal, the nobody and the unnoticed, elevated into the sublime…’ (Buchan: 1996)

In her essay, Shifting Realities – The Brothers Quay – Between Live Action and Animation, Suzanne Buchan observes that other animators have imitated the unique style of the Brothers Quay. This investigation seeks to trace that influence by comparing their short 1986 film, Street of Crocodiles with Henry Selick’s Coraline (2009)…

* If you can’t provide a succinct introduction for your discussion, chances are you’re not quite ready to write the essay. You need to make your argument clear – without one, you are submitting a ‘blancmange’.

When referring to a film for the first time, always give proper title (with capital letters!), release date and director; after that, you can use title only. Please check spelling of film title – if it’s a made-up word, the spell check won’t know the difference!

When referring to a person for the first time, use full name – after that, use surname only.

You must use Harvard Method for quotations!

Use footnotes for ‘additional’ information that is important or contextualizing but ‘outside’ of the main body of the essay.

Please double-space your written assignments!

You must provide a paper-copy at time of crit!

Post a Comment

 
Powered by Blogger